this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
7 points (100.0% liked)
NZ Politics
856 readers
19 users here now
Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!
This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi
This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick
Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Most of the rules were already proposed and consulted on under the last government. Major difference is that all cyclists would have been able to use the footpath, not just children.
Unfortunately, it was yet another piece of legislation that was ready to be passed which Labour just sat on.
And a shame they slapped an age bracket on footpath pedalling
People get killed being hit by bikes occasionally so you can understand some hesitation, but I'm sure there could have been a reasonable compromise (e.g. a footpath speed limit).
Assuming there are no bike lanes, it should just be maths.
If the number of fatalities in car-bike collisions is more than the number of pedestrian-bike collisions then bike belong on the footpath.
This could be weighted by severity of injury instead of fatalities.
If there are bike lanes and scooters, then the matrix is just slightly larger but the maths still holds.
The point is to minimize, find the optimal solution rather than try to find the unrealistic perfect solution.