this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
402 points (95.5% liked)

Dank Memes

7809 readers
476 users here now

This is the place to be on the interweb when Reddit irreversibly becomes a meme itself and implodes

If you are existing mods from r/dankmemes, you should be mod here too, kindly DM me on either platform

The many rules inherited from

  1. Be nice, don't be not nice
  2. No Bigotry or Bullying
  3. Don't be a dick!
  4. Censor any and all personal information from posts and comments
  5. No spam, outside links, or videos.
  6. No Metabaiting
  7. No brigading
  8. Keep it dank!
  9. Mark NSFW and spoilers appropriately
  10. NO REEEEEEE-POSTS!
  11. No shitposting
  12. Format your meme correctly. No posts where the title is the meme caption!
  13. No agenda posting!
  14. Don't be a critic
  15. Karma threshold? What's that?

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CTDummy@piefed.social 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The ironing of assuming the worst, that someone is ableist before using dehumanising language by referring to people as slime. Cant beat it. Dude was temporarily injured anyway.

Every person ever has an excuse to ditch trollies of varying validity. No one would ever answer “because I’m a lazy, inconsiderate arsehole” if asked why they left it. Which can easily explain people assuming he’s one of said people and the downvotes. As someone who’s disabled would say “Im disabled” or something to that effect, not “I hurt my knee”. Much more likely than they hold the physically disabled to the same standard or are assuming “everyone who’s disabled should have an aide”. Get a grip.

[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world -1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Ableists are subhuman slime.

Not ironic, morally consistent. There is no paradox of tolerance.

Having a temporary injury still affects ability.

Crazy to expect people with difficulty moving to move more for your sake.

If they are assuming "everyone who's disabled should have an aide", well, first off they're strictly wrong. And secondly? They shouldn't be making assumptions? Ever heard that saying?

I didn't make assumptions. I saw someone make ableist statements. I called them ableist. They can retract their ableism at their discretion.

Get a grip. And maybe a more thoughtful argument steeped in logic and rational objectivity.

[–] CTDummy@piefed.social 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Having a temporary injury still affects ability.

But is not disabled, by definition and therefore calling people criticising them ableist, is incorrect. Let’s try to keep this based in logic and rational objectivity.

The point that sailed over your head in your further attempt to do what passes as virtue signal by your metric, is that you’re engaging in the same behaviour you’re criticising. Judging people without attempting to understand, hence my attempt to explain they likely are not, as you accuse “assuming all disabled should have aides”. While providing potential reason for why the initial comment was downvoted. Ableism while morally bankrupt and disgusting behaviour doesn’t warrant referring to people as “subhuman slime”.