this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
1175 points (99.2% liked)

Open Source

44855 readers
1299 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Source: Mastodon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] angrywaffle@piefed.social 7 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

That's unfortunate. I understand the admin's perspective, but most users, myself included, are likely in the dark about these backend issues. It’s frustrating to have barriers to following people in an already small community. Is this just the inevitable tradeoff of federation? If anyone knows of a less regulated piefed instance, I’m all ears.

[–] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 1 points 13 hours ago

As far as I can tell piefed.ca seems to be less regulated than piefed.social 

[–] railway692@piefed.zip 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Is this just the inevitable tradeoff of federation?

Not being able to follow someone isn't a federation problem, it's an instance mismatch problem.

When you can't follow the people you want on Twitter (because they were banned), that's an instance mismatch. Your preferences don't align with Twitter's.

The difference is that, with Twitter, there is only one instance. You can't switch to a different Twitter where those people aren't blocked.

On Fedi, you can choose an instance that blocks and federates according to your preference. And if you can't find one (unlikely for most users), you can host your own.

If you just want Piefed instances with less regulation, these appear to have the fewest number of blocks: