this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
87 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
803 readers
513 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No pearl clutching. Not Slop.
Article still seemed reactionary to me. Referring to acts of "vandalism". There's a whole movement of people against these cameras.
No its not. The article spends most of its words explaining why people are vandalizing the cameras. It clearly draws the its connections to ICE. It mentions multiple legal attempts to block it. It doesn't talk about any "benefits" of the surveillance system and explicitly calls it a "surveillance system". Almost everyone it cites are pro-privacy. That's being as anti-flock as you can get without saying "go destroy flock cameras".
CN should be required listening. Or maybe just reading the article.
Centrist liberals likely. I guess centrist liberal is redundant though.