this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
41 points (97.7% liked)

World News

3160 readers
93 users here now

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So what I'm hearing is that the absolute best thing Trump can do is attack Iran? All those consequences sound fucking great to me. Especially cutting off 20% of the world supply of oil. Completely obliterating Israel sounds great too. Where is the downside?

[–] 201dberg@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Where is the downside?

Hundreds, thousands, and more innocent dead Iranians. Potential world war and nuclear armageddon.

[–] thlibos@thelemmy.club -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well the destruction of Israel would be a net positive, and forcing the world to have less oil is also good for humanity. Is this the optimal outcome for humanity as a whole? No. But assuming the Mad King executes his plan to attack Iran, if the outcome described by the article comes true it's a net-good. Also consider that Trump will not do anything that is good intentionally, so we just have to look at the silver-lining, and if the destruction of Israel is part of that silver-lining then it's the best case scenario and unintentionally the best thing Trump has ever done.

[–] thlibos@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think the Xtian nationalists in Trump's circle want this destruction since they see it as a precursor to the rapture.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've heard this postulated since Bush Jr. but no. Christian fundamentalist are a useful voting bloc, they have influence on cultural issues that don't matter if you are trying to make money. (LBGT/Abortion etc) but war in Central America, Africa, South East Asia, all happen without them.

[–] thlibos@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 day ago

Not sure what you mean to say here.