this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
66 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8975 readers
148 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Top Democratic officials who worked on the party's still-secret autopsy of the 2024 election concluded that Kamala Harris lost significant support because of the Biden administration's approach to the war in Gaza, Axios has learned.

The Democratic National Committee's research on what went wrong in 2024 has been under lock and key since party leaders decided last year to hide it from the public — a reflection of how explosively it could resonate within the party and beyond.

Axios independently verified that Democratic officials conducting the autopsy believed the issue harmed the party's standing with some voters.

The IMEU Policy Project is now accusing the DNC of withholding its report in part because of its findings on Israel.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah? Well if it takes an investigation to figure that out they're truly the biggest dumb fucks in all of political theater.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They probably wanted a study and report because it's one thing to have a hypothesis, it's another to get actual data and prove it. Hopefully they got a comprehensive report and will actually act on the results. Arguably they should have gotten good data on what their constituents want BEFORE the election.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They won’t. They support Israel because of the legal bribes they receive.

The only members of congress speaking out against the genocide are the only congresspeople who don’t accept AIPAC money.

Supporters of the Israeli regime are scum.

I won’t vote for them and I will encourage my friends to follow suit.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Its wild that people that have devoted at least a portion of their lives to working in government would be so easily swayed by mere money, and arguably not a lot of money, to support a whole different government who is clearly doing horrific things. It's not like these people are short on money either, they're all wealthy, a lot of them millionaire wealthy.

[–] TiredTiger@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Working in elected office means dancing when your donors say dance. It selects for people willing to do anything for an extra buck. Anyone who actually had principles wouldn't make it through the gauntlet that is campaigning in the US, and that's by design. Why do you think neither party seems interested in campaign finance reform?

[–] limer@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I assume a lot of that is blackmail or pressure from people being blackmailed.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But that's just as wild, so many people in so many governments have either been bought for a pittance or blackmailed and none of them have retaliated or given the blackmailers the finger and exposed them anyway. I would be furious if I was a member of a g20 government and some genocidal dickhead from Israel had the gall to try and first buy my vote and second blackmail me into submission. I'd make it my life's mission to see them and their entire nefarious network exposed and rendered useless.

[–] limer@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

I’ve read blackmail allegations in different news stories for a long time, some in mainstream newspapers. Additionally federal USA politicians are usually not very nice people.

But even if one were to discount all that, the whole thing is, as you said, very weird