this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2026
421 points (99.3% liked)

politics

29241 readers
1682 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Unfortunately, without the numbers in the house and the senate, they won't be able to do anything. They can present articles of impeachment all they want, but they won't get the votes from republicans.

Their best bet is to sway the court of public opinion to help flip the house and the senate. But there are so many people who won't give a crap, and will continue voting for the guys protecting pedophiles.

[–] m4xie@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Democrats were in power for 4 years without releasing the files. Why would they now? Or ever?

[–] monkeyjoe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because their donors were in them. They didn't want to reveal they go to the same island.

[–] m4xie@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Yes, that's why they didn't release them. I asked, what's changed that means they would release them now all of a sudden?

No matter how many seats they flip, they don't seem unable, they seem disinclined. When they were able, they chose not to.

[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Democrats treated the DOJ as an independent agency. Merrick Garland was a horrible choice.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Stop pretending like politicians are going to save us. 95% of them are complicit or are simply making too much money from the status quo to want to change things. We're going to have to actually roll up our sleeves and organize ourselves if we want real change.

[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is the defeatist shit attitude that people in power want you to have. Give up, go home, take it without lube.

You can run, you can support other candidates, you can get involved. But you are choosing defeatism.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It is literally anti-defeatist. I am telling people to take more action to guarantee our democracy. If you still think the government wants to run a fair election this year, you haven't been paying attention. The best way to make sure that doesn't happen is to make sure our grassroots politics are stronger than theirs, so go out and organize!

Defeatism is acting like we only have to put up with Trump until midterms or at worst next the election cycle, while doing nothing except post on social media.

[–] NeilBru@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I suppose the Democrats^tm^ could fillibuster and obstruct every bill possible like the Republicans^tm^ have for years until enough Republicans^tm^ agree to enact the articles of impeachment.

[–] Stormy@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 month ago

They don't seem to care anymore and just let them do whatever. I'd rather everything was shutdown than continue another day of doing what a child rapist wants to do