this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
87 points (93.1% liked)

Selfhosted

56779 readers
339 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've noticed a lot of posts lately that are just spam for slopware, often not even having anything to do with self-hosting. As sad as I am about it, I'm pretty close to unsubscribing to keep spam out of my Lemmy feeds.

Before doing so, though, I wanted to ask if there was any formal policy or rule for the community that could help cut down on thr spam, and if so, what would be most useful for me to do when I see a spam post? That I'd, is the Report button the right tool, is there some other way to let moderators know?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] punksnotdead@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

downvote proponents are just saying, "Yeah, well my way is better. Lemmy is only for people who do it my way."

If anything you're the one being obtuse and saying your way is better and that people must adapt to your way. Downvotes are the default behaviour of the software and the "reddit-like" experience of Lemmy

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com -5 points 2 days ago

If better means "more inclusive," then yes. It's better. Did I say to stop downvoting? No. Did I tell people to abandon their downvoting-enabled instances? No (though have a look and see how I've been told multiple times to leave mine).

Dunno why people are hellbent on excluding people who don't want optional downvotes when non-optional reporting exists.

But do go on about how I'm excluding the poor instances with downvotes by recommending an inclusive action that they also benefit from.