this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
201 points (99.0% liked)

World News

54043 readers
3069 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In previously unreported remarks, the U.S. administration warned Brussels that it will retaliate if Europeans “strong-arm American companies out of the market.”

U.S. President Donald Trump's administration has threatened to retaliate against European countries if the EU favors domestic weapons-makers in a drive to rearm the continent.

The U.S. Department of Defense objected to any EU effort to limit American arms-manufacturers' access to the European market and warned that would trigger a reciprocal response.

The administration made the previously unreported remarks in a contribution to a European Commission consultation earlier this month, after the EU’s executive branch requested feedback from governments and industry on European weapons procurement rules.

MBFC
Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Isn't this the free market they love so much?

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Uhm, no. The EU specifically excluding providers based on their location is very much not the free market at work.

(They can get fucked tho, euro products all the way baby)

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'd argue that the Trumps implication that the US can disable many of these weapons remotely is already a perfectly valid free market reason to not buy them, I mean who wants a back door built into your self defence apparatus?

[–] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 4 minutes ago

Did the president allude to the kill switches in the gear? I missed that, I believe in the kill switches though.

[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Agreed. Trump has made it clear that Europe needs weapons primarily to defend itself from the USA.

It wasn’t Iran that threatened to invade Greenland. Wasn’t russia financing Canadian separatists and threatening to annex a Nato member.

America is a gangster state. Boycotting the USA is a free-market decision, and the ONLY rational one.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Thats a free market reason not to buy them, but not what is happening. The EU arming initiative stipulates specifically that x% of the procurement must be from EU producers, no? Not free market then.