this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
413 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

83931 readers
3611 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
413
California’s New Bill Requires DOJ-Approved 3D Printers That Report on Themselves (blog.adafruit.com)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Beep@lemmus.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
236 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

California’s new bill requires DOJ-approved 3D printers that report on themselves targeting general-purpose machines.

Assembly Member Bauer-Kahan introduced AB-2047, the “California Firearm Printing Prevention Act,” on February 17th. The bill would ban the sale or transfer of any 3D printer in California unless it appears on a state-maintained roster of approved makes and models… certified by the Department of Justice as equipped with “firearm blocking technology.” Manufacturers would need to submit attestations for every make and model. The DOJ would publish a list. If your printer isn’t on the list by March 1, 2029, it can’t be sold. In addition, knowingly disabling or circumventing the blocking software is a misdemeanor.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SalamenceFury@piefed.social 94 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (13 children)

They are essentially trying to regulate technology they know very little about.

That's not surprising, that's just what politicians do. Especially politicians who are 65+ years old and completely out of touch with technology.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (11 children)

I am reminded of a senator from Alaska trying to describe the internet as a series of tubes.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Sen Ted Stevens, rest in piss.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"The internet would be a series of tubes if we rolled out fiber, but as the literal chairman of the Senate committee regulating the internet I'm somehow against that."

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Isn’t most fiber optics solid glass? So more a series of rods.

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Well, tubes from light's perspective.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)