this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
32 points (92.1% liked)

Television and Film

213 readers
134 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Battlestar Galactica? Doctor Who? Star Trek: The Next Generation?

[–] hesh@quokk.au 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Weren't those new shows with new casts? This is the same show and cast being brought back two decades later

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You said "reboot" without any other qualifiers, so that was my attempt at some examples.

I think the term we're actually looking for here is "revival." "Girl Meets World" seemed to do OK, as well as "Dexter: New Blood" ... The airtime of the successors from this article is probably a good indicator: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_television_series_revivals

[–] hesh@quokk.au 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My bad I guess I mixed up the terms, thanks for clarifying

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

NP, I think we both learned something

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

My Little Pony? (G3 -> G4, not G4 -> G5)

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Next Generation is a continuation of Star Trek. Though, I’m sure a lot of people saw it as an attempted replacement of Kirk and Spock when it was announced.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Formulaically, it was indeed a reboot with new characters taking on aspects of the old roles, as well as a tone shift to match the 20-year gap; I imagine it was inserted into the existing timeline in order to preserve all of the world building that had already been done, similar to what was later done with Doctor Who.