this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
31 points (94.3% liked)

Television and Film

211 readers
128 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hesh@quokk.au 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (6 children)

Is anyone surprised? When has a TV ~~reboot~~ revival worked?

[–] GiantRobotTRex@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Futurama was revived multiple times. The quality of the Hulu revival may be debatable but the Comedy Central revival was undeniably successful.

Whether you like Family Guy or not, its revival was definitely a major financial success for Fox.

[–] hesh@quokk.au 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Financial success isn't my personal benchmark, but I don't argue your point there. I think the first revival of Futurama was worth it, since it was cancelled too early, but the latest stuff has definitely made me say "just leave it alone at this point"

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 17 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Battlestar Galactica? Doctor Who? Star Trek: The Next Generation?

[–] hesh@quokk.au 13 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Weren't those new shows with new casts? This is the same show and cast being brought back two decades later

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You said "reboot" without any other qualifiers, so that was my attempt at some examples.

I think the term we're actually looking for here is "revival." "Girl Meets World" seemed to do OK, as well as "Dexter: New Blood" ... The airtime of the successors from this article is probably a good indicator: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_television_series_revivals

[–] hesh@quokk.au 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

My bad I guess I mixed up the terms, thanks for clarifying

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

NP, I think we both learned something

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

My Little Pony? (G3 -> G4, not G4 -> G5)

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The Next Generation is a continuation of Star Trek. Though, I’m sure a lot of people saw it as an attempted replacement of Kirk and Spock when it was announced.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

Formulaically, it was indeed a reboot with new characters taking on aspects of the old roles, as well as a tone shift to match the 20-year gap; I imagine it was inserted into the existing timeline in order to preserve all of the world building that had already been done, similar to what was later done with Doctor Who.

[–] JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The King of the Hill revival has been decent, in my opinion.

[–] sudoMakeUser@sh.itjust.works 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It has been a great return to form. It is missing a little piece of the charm with Dale's actor passing but yes, overall quite good.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 14 hours ago

And John Redcorn's VA got murdered after the first season ended...

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

Reboot?

DuckTales, Battlestar Galactica, House of Cards, Fruits Basket, Lost in Space…

Reunion? As in a continuation of an existing series after many years have passed? I can’t think of any that are considered as good as the original run by fans.

[–] undeffeined@lemmy.ml 2 points 19 hours ago

I very much enjoyed Dexter Resurrection. New blood was Ok, but I think it was due to that aweful ending on the original ending

[–] Brutticus@midwest.social 2 points 20 hours ago

I was really digging the Saved by the Bell reboot. I thought it had enough awareness and edge to really tear into the original's classless, atemporal premise. I think streaming has kind of turned media consumption into an amorphous firehose of "content" and slop where anything struggles to register. I do think that if SbtB had hit a little earlier, on a service anyone gave a fuck about (Peacock? are you kidding me?) it might have found its footing.

I guess Cobra Kai is my real answer.