this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
251 points (99.2% liked)
news
675 readers
924 users here now
A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.
Rules:
- Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
- Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
- Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
- Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
- No link shorteners
- No entire article in the post body
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'd settle for him experiencing non-consensual sex from the other POV
No. Just no.
Kill someone, and you've done less harm than raping them. It's an indignity I'd not wish on even the abusers.
Do not stare too long into the abyss, make a clean break instead. Which is a simple way to say that I am willing to talk about death penalties. I'd still not generally approve of death when imprisonment is available, except in cases of attempted coups. Those fuckers need to die as fast as possible because if not, they try again and often succeed, and then everyone loses.
Basically, my policy is "remove the source of harm, while not giving into the justifiable rage that those sources of harm would be proud of".
You give them a day in court where you air all of their dirty laundry, and then you lock them away for the rest of their life. Treat them exactly the same as any other prisoner. Maybe subject them to experimental psychologists and mandatory group therapy. Get some use out of them while trying vainly to make them understand that they are not in fact the smartest people in the room, and are actually monsters.
And if they ever miraculously come to that realization, you leave them locked up because they are monsters who cannot be trusted.