this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
105 points (99.1% liked)
Politics
1084 readers
200 users here now
For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.
Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable
Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.
Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.
The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up
Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)
Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term
Media owners, CEOs and/or board members
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I see what you're talking about and I think that is because he's a veteran politician and knows the kinds of questions that will be asked so of course his answers are polished.
I also think a bit of that is because he's a 'real' christian, as in he practices the teachings of Jesus, goes to church, etc. There's a certain cadence and style of speaking amongst seminarians that fits well into a church setting and politics (preaching to an audience that agrees with you).
He's a bit more off the cuff in other interviews that I've seen (including on some YT show where he's talking with a bunch of undecided voters).
I think we're just too used to politicians who speak like they're reading off of teleprompters and less used to people who can improvise effective speech without speechwriters and consultants.
It's not like he has a hard job he's spreading the populist message that was so effective with MAGA under Trump: "The world is fucked up, the rich elites are at fault due to owning the government and only using it to enrich themselves" It's a safe message that resonates, he fits the profile of a stereotypical rural Texan and doesn't accept large donors (a fact that will separate him from Jasmine Crockett).
I get what you mean about preachers. I’ve heard Raphael Warnock in person in both political and religious contexts and that man can hold an audience.
I think the Church is one of the few institutions that culturally values good rhetorical techniques.
They're all reading the same book, so the people that stand out are the ones who are expert public speakers and understand how to invoke feelings instead of just delivering a written message.
His style of speech screams 'pastor' to people who grew up in churches and for a lot of Texans that's very compelling.
I never thought about it that was; that’s a great point about the mechanism for differentiation.
I hadn't heard of him until today, but his messaging is on point and he isn't shying away from the populist messaging.
Having someone who has the ability to inspire is a pretty powerful skill. Obama is another good example, his experience as a professor provides similar rhetorical skills.
I mean, there's also some dangerous examples of charismatic populists in history... but I don't read this guy as being cynically manipulative (though, I can be fooled like anyone else).
TIL a 36 year old who's spent 7 years in the Texas House of Representatives is a veteran politician
I am deeply sorry sir, I didn't know that you were here and made the mistake of using the term 'veteran politician' without consulting The Gatekeeper.
Oh wise gatekeeper of the term 'veteran politician', tell me the number of terms of service a politician is required to serve in order to be considered a veteran.
Maybe next we can mock the Iraq and Afghanistan veterans who only served 4 years.
I apologize for my mistake and hope that you don't report me to the Internet Police.
Someone who has served even a month on active duty is by definition a "veteran" as far as the military is concerned, but that has nothing to do with this. Clearly my argument is that James Talarico is actually a pretty new politician, but I seem to have touched a nerve...
Yeah, my feeling are super hurt thanks for apologizing.