this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
351 points (99.2% liked)

World News

53971 readers
2819 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

More than a year after a 33-year-old woman froze to death on Austria's highest mountain, her boyfriend goes on trial on Thursday accused of gross negligent manslaughter.

Kerstin G died of hypothermia on a mountain climbing trip to the Grossglockner that went horribly wrong. Her boyfriend is accused of leaving her unprotected and exhausted close to the summit in stormy conditions in the early hours of 19 January 2025, while he went to get help.

The trial has sparked interest and debate, not just in Austria but in mountain climbing communities far beyond its borders.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Allowed her to wear? Does he control her wardrobe?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 4 hours ago

"Are you really going to wear THAT?" is a question that men learn to never ask.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

no, but its extremely negligent to not suggest proper boots and gear for the hike. him being an experience hiker/climber should know that. since his intention is likely malicious its more than likely he allowed that.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca -1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

You can't charge someone for lack of advice. The woman has responsibility for her own stupid decisions.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Kind of a grey area, though.

If you see someone out picking mushrooms and they pick a poisonous one and you don't say anything, sure, its not your responsibility.

If you take someone out to pick mushrooms and they pick a poisonous one and you know its poisonous and you let them eat it anyway, that's criminal.

You can't argue that someone that hosts free mushrooms hunting tours into dangerous territory and allows a bunch of amatuers to pick and eat deadly mushrooms isn't liable.

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago

Agreed, but it appears to me that they were equally experienced. He indeed was at risk as well. It appears like a case of unconsciousness and inability to evaluate risk. I brought people picking mushrooms on several occasions and indeed I'd monitor what they're picking. But if I go with a friend who knows as much as I do it is unlikely I will ask regarding them picking a mushroom I don't know. I had friends picking mushrooms which are known poisonous and they had their reasons for doing that which were completely valid and did not endanger anyone.

From the article it does not appear that the boy was much more experienced than the girl, it may be incorrectly described in the article as I have not read more information about this. If that is the case I would not see the reason to consider this a crime, as he was not in the conditions to understand the repercussions of those decisions. The fact that he didn't call for help could indeed be criminal conduct, but it also be that he was under shock and couldn't handle the situation or that there was no coverage. While this being a crime is understandable, it is probably hard to prove this was a crime.

[–] PapstJL4U@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He cannot force her to wear anything, but as the experienced climber he can deny the tour/guidance. If you have the skill, but neglect to use them in human fashion, that makes it more than an accident.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Formalizing an outing with a social/romantic partner to the same degree as a professional guide/tour giver is a disastrous precedent to set

[–] rants_unnecessarily@piefed.social 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He was considerably more experienced as a climber. And even I could tell you not to go mountain climbing in snowboarding boots.

If I were to take someone mountain climbing I wouldn't allow them to wear life threatening clothing.

[–] 0x0@infosec.pub 14 points 20 hours ago

'Her social media feed suggests she was a keen mountaineer and her mother has told German media that she loved mountain hiking at night.'

[–] Biffsbraincell@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

Yeah I was wondering about that too, it only makes sense in a context where he's much much more knowledgeable about mountaineering than her.