this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
218 points (98.7% liked)
Hardware
6217 readers
70 users here now
All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.
Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:
- Augmented Reality - !augmented_reality@lemmy.world
- Gaming Laptops - !gaminglaptops@piefed.social
- Laptops - !laptops@piefed.social
- Linux Hardware - !linuxhardware@programming.dev
- Mechanical Keyboards - !mechanical_keyboards@programming.dev
- Monitors - !monitors@piefed.social
- Raspberry Pi - !raspberry_pi@programming.dev
- Retro Computing - !retrocomputing@lemmy.sdf.org
- Virtual Reality - !virtualreality@lemmy.world
Rules (Click to Expand):
-
Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about
-
Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.
-
No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.
-
Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.
-
Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).
-
If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.
Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
LLMs haven't been growing exponentially for the past 2 years. What we are seeing right now are the final stages of optimizing the product(by OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.), and initial stages of consumers/companies figuring out actual effective areas of application.
Effective areas of application are basically nil.
Not sure what else to say really.
^ this is a take that's only possible by being mis/uninformed. Talk to software engineers this month and ask if Claude Code is effective in their field.
(I don't blame you, it's a rampant opinion on Lemmy)
I'm an experienced programmer. I've used Claude Code and though it's initially impressive the results are still hit and miss. If the job is very simple and/or you're starting from scratch it can do OK but it takes a bit of time to review what it did. If it isn't simple or you're working on a large and complex code base the chances of it getting it right get low enough that you're on balance better off doing it yourself. You're going to have to review all the changes carefully anyway, and if they're not right you'll be backing them out and retrying different prompts repeatedly when you could just be writing the code.
I work in IT, I'm not a coder. I've seen this stuff used for office things and the output from all that is basically trash.
It's like having a child for an assistant who is high on LSD all the time but has a remarkable grasp on the English language despite all of that, and they speak incredibly confidently regardless of the topic.
The work basically needs to be double checked at every step and often needs to be rewritten. It doesn't really save time, just moves your workload from producing the text to being a copy editor.
aaaaaaaaahahahahahahaaaaaaaahahahahaaaaaa.
Not.