this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
87 points (86.0% liked)

Linux

12407 readers
424 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Still using these obsolete Linux commands? They might be popular from the olden days but perhaps it is time to look for alternatives.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

rsync is cool but is nowhere a replacement for scp's main use case. scp actually uses your SSH client settings file, whereas rsync doesn't (it does have the opportunity to use a SSH command, which you then have to setup separately).

[–] Brummbaer@pawb.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not sure I get what you mean. In every distro I used so far rsync did use ssh by default so it would honor everything I set in the ssh config.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not everything however. For it to catch some options , for example SOCKS bridges, you have to use the SSH passthrough notation aka rsync -e 'ssh bridgename...' --rsync-options.... And ofc if you have to load a different SSH conffile, you have to use the while passthrough for that as well, there's no rsync native option to load a SSH conffile: rsync -e 'ssh -F conffile ssh_options...' --rsync-options....

[–] poinck@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

I am guilty of using scp. Glad to see that there is a reimplementation going on.