Slop.

797 readers

487 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

VILenin@hexbear.net

MiraculousMM@hexbear.net

Hestia@hexbear.net

oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net

Diva@lemmy.ml

Diva@hexbear.net

mathemachristian@hexbear.net

Anthropic CEO Says Company No Longer Sure Whether Claude Is Conscious (futurism.com)

submitted 2 days ago by BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net to c/slop@hexbear.net

54 comments fedilink hide all child comments

“Suppose you have a model that assigns itself a 72 percent chance of being conscious,” Douthat began. “Would you believe it?”

Amodei called it a “really hard” question to answer, but hesitated to give a yes or no answer.

Be nice to the stochastic parrots, folks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] DasRav@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That's a terrible argument. It wasn't me making the claim so I don't know why I gotta prove anything. The frauds making the theft machines have to prove it. If the guy says '“Suppose you have a model that assigns itself a 72 percent chance of being conscious" and then the thing can't show it's math, how is it on me to prove I can do that math I haven't seen next?