this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
245 points (95.2% liked)

science

26018 readers
423 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

i'm not an expert but i use IF for autophagy and gut health. it's the only thing i've tried that worked for me for weight loss. i'm down 40+ lb from a year ago.

i think a lot of "studies" are ordered up by some organizations that hate intermittent fasting, because rather than replacing one food with another food, you're reducing the food, period. which means you're spending less money. which corporations hate.

so, pooh-pooh on IF

i just finished eating for the day, will not eat again until tomorrow, and i'll sleep great because of it

[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Not everything is a conspiracy.

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

Hahahahaha.

Funny.

But if you want to get technical, when I say "not everything is a conspiracy", those words themselves imply that some conspiracies exist. So you pointing to a conspiracy is completely redundant, not only funny.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So corporations do have my best interest at heart? 🤔

[–] xep@discuss.online 2 points 1 month ago

my best interests

That's a funny way of spelling shareholder value!

[–] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The intermittent fasting corporation dumbass?

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What evidence do you have that all the studies are corrupt?

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i didn't say "all the studies," so let's go ahead and stop changing each others' words to whatever we prefer they said

also, fraud in the scientific literature has been going on forever.

https://www.nextgenpurpose.com/articles/industry-funded-food-studies-trust-bias-solutions

https://www.balanced.org/post/amplifiers-of-bad-science-how-food-companies-distort-nutrition-science-part-ii

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10260999/

that latest one is about sugar companies telling you you're fat only because you're not exercising enough, not because you drink 7 cokes per day

so far, we've ignored the AI angle:

https://www.acsh.org/news/2024/03/12/scientific-fraud-age-ai-17714

https://truthscan.com/blog/ai-driven-fraud-in-global-healthcare-2025-trends-and-countermeasures/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/torconstantino/2024/09/13/ai-tools-fuel-rise-of-fake-research-papers-on-google-scholar/

again, i'm not saying ALL papers are fraudulent or even biased, but i'm definitely skeptical of scientific "conclusions" that dismiss methods that involve spending less money and/or blames the patient's problems on "not enough exercise" while ignoring dietary habits

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Okay, yeah, I came in too aggressive and sorry for that.