this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
371 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

81286 readers
4062 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

According to a protected disclosure filed with the Office of Special Counsel, Borges told the Government Accountability Project that DOGE officials working at Social Security created a “live copy” of the country’s Social Security records in a separate cloud environment that sidestepped usual security checks.

The group says those lapses put the Social Security information of more than 300 million Americans at risk.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] guywithoutaname@lemmy.world 55 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Regardless of whether or not they are breached, the social security numbering system needs to be changed because it is far from a secure number.

[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 1 points 1 hour ago

Changing the system do not make it more secure by default. Here the SSN equivalent is calculated with your name, surname, date and place of birth and a check code, and it is not a secret how to calculate it (it was the very first program you write if you study IT at school for example).

The problem is not SSN number itself, but the fact that you need only it to do everything.

[–] dgriffith@aussie.zone 48 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

because it is far from a secure number.

It is only the American obsession with using it as a unique identifier for everything in their lives that has caused this issue.

[–] SketchySeaBeast@lemmy.ca 38 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The problem is they are using Identification for authentication.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It is not even identification, it is literally just a number that anyone can use.

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 19 points 17 hours ago

That's true of all names. Names are still a form of identification. But it doesn't authenticate that you are a specific person.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 15 points 18 hours ago

It would be less expensive to simply trust everyone. Administering a numbering system and trying to prevent fraud costs more than the actual fraud it prevents, and does nothing to prevent the larger frauds.

It's like having a chain on the pen at the bank, with a security guard watching the chain, and three managers making aure the secuirty guard is watching the chain all day, but the cash drawers are open and the three managers simply help themselves to as much cash as they like.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 11 points 17 hours ago

You say that like we had any part in every single service asking for our SSN lmfao