this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
71 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3849 readers
219 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes/pics of text

Post news related to the United States.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"​An unmistakable majority wants a party that will fight harder against the corporations and rich people they see as responsible for keeping them down," wrote the New Republic's editorial director.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It works in a vaccum where economic policy is the same due to uniparty, but again that doesn't work when put up against popular policies.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

A lot of government assistance programs were popular, and they were eroded anyway because their popularity wasn't sustained through outreach and propaganda. Democrats wouldn't stand up for government assistance programs because they didn't really like them either, so the only thing people heard was how bad it was. There needs to be a concerted effort to educate the masses.

Policies aren't popular on their own. They still have to be made popular and kept popular, by activists and politicians and parties.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

They remain popular. They were cut not because they lost popularity, but because nobody were willing to improve them and that then allowed racists to win and cut them. Most openly racist modern politician Trump campaigned on keeping all the social safety net programs because they were popular and are still popular, if someone would have campainged on expanding them they would have won instead.

US has presidential term limits because racists were incapable of winning against popular policies back in the day.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

And yet, people voted for candidates who pledged to cut them. That has to be reckoned with.

There's definitely a problem with Democrats being unwilling to improve these programs, because ultimately the Democratic leadership hates government programs too, but there's also the problem with people voting to take government benefits away form undesirables. Again, policies aren't popular on their own, they need to be promoted and advanced. We have a role to play.