this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2026
554 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

81286 readers
3945 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hacker News.

Just a decade after a global backlash was triggered by Snowden reporting on mass domestic surveillance, the state-corporate dragnet is stronger and more invasive than ever.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 94 points 1 day ago (3 children)

the thing 1984 got wrong is that people are willingly buying their own (multiple) telescreens and happily submitting their entire life to the party

[–] VeryVito@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is why Fahrenheit 451 (and not 1984) is my go-to analogy for today’s plight: Bradbury correctly predicted that people would willingly walk themselves into an oppressive technocracy for the sake of entertainment and convenience.

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

i mean we could say we're living through 1984, brave new world, Fahrenheit 451, handmaid's tale, maybe lolita--i haven't read that one, but heard it's a bit child-rapey

whatever it is, no one source has really encapsulated the hell of actual reality today

[–] shane@feddit.nl 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I don't find Brave New World to be especially dystopian. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 hours ago

I haven't read it, what's not dystopian about it?

The first thing Wikipedia says about it is "Brave New World is a dystopian novel" 😅

Maybe you not finding it especially dystopian says more about the state of the world right now than the book... 😅

[–] valek879@sh.itjust.works 45 points 1 day ago

We didn't see how we got to 1984. We just see one person living with consequences of what society has become. We're building our own 1984 right now!

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

1984 and brave new world ass world

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

relevant webcomic contrasting 1984 and brave new world, which is insightful, but doesn't include the reality that we're literally living in both novels' universes

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Give me brave new world all day - it would be vastly preferable to whatever this shit is.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 2 points 2 hours ago

It seems Brave new world is the global north/middle class, 1984 is the global south/working class... With class experience varying by county and over time with a tend towards 1984 experience as the majorities wealth gets extracted by the upper class.

[–] shane@feddit.nl 2 points 15 hours ago

Definitely. A world where people are happy and healthy and live basically fulfilling lives. There are a few fanatics who opt out, and they're unhappy. Go figure.