this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
230 points (93.2% liked)

politics

28250 readers
3088 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

No you are one of many saying vote for the dems no matter the terrible candidate while we've had nothing but failures from them, and constant capitulations to republicans. Especially when newsom is a republican just running as a dem like so many others in the party.

Just because the republicans get instant loyalty does not mean any one owes a party votes. There's no point in voting for the dems when either way it ends up with the same outcome

[–] ejhal@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

Thanks for telling me what I'm saying, but that ain't it.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

I'm pointing out is that the conservatives are winning because they are willing to line up behind complete garbage. If the progressives want to make real change, they have to be willing to rally, and that will likely mean rallying behind a non ideal candidate, and likely rallying with those that we feel are amoral.

we need the progressives to line up behind the right leaning dems

It literally is but sure say it's not

[–] ejhal@lemmy.world -1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

You read the words, but you missed the meaning, and on top of that you read things into my words, that I did not say... I never mentioned rallying behind "right leaning dems", that's what you assumed I meant.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Because that's the only dems there are?

If it wasn't you're meaning you should really edit the comment to not make it read that way

[–] ejhal@lemmy.world -1 points 10 hours ago

Because that's the only dems there are?

Yeah, that's pretty much true

I doubt an edit would help, to me what I wrote is clear, i lack the writing skill to make it any clearer. I've found attempting to write with nuance online is usually a waste of keystrokes anyway, few read and contemplate before reacting.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)