this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
189 points (98.0% liked)

science

25130 readers
424 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

From the surface, Chetumal Bay looks almost placid – just a wide sheet of water with no hint of drama underneath. But below that calm is Taam ja’, a massive underwater sinkhole, or “blue hole,” that’s turned into an unexpected mystery for scientists.

At first, the plan seemed straightforward: map it with sonar, get a depth, move on. Instead, the early readings created a bigger problem – what if Taam ja’ isn’t anywhere near as shallow as those first numbers suggested?

The most recent measurements point to a hole that drops far deeper than expected, and the true bottom may still be out of reach...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The thing is they DID test it! And they even had a working failure detection mechanism with the microphones. They had seen the signs of failure from previous dives. And then just ignored all of that.

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

The CEO also left the sub exposed to the Canadian winter and freeze/thaw cycles because he was too cheap to pay for climate controlled storage

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wow.

Guess their definition of test and mine are different. I'd want a whole slew of testing regimen, including test to failure over a long time - essentially years of running it unmanned.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 4 points 1 day ago

You can definitely thoroughly test something then ignore the results.

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I don’t think it would’ve mattered because they had all the evidence they needed and just ignored it regardless.