this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
208 points (98.1% liked)

Communism

2717 readers
148 users here now

Welcome to the communist Lemmy community! This is a community for all Marxist.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spacesatan@leminal.space -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well it was net operating income, so before reinvestment expenses. But are you trying to count all future profits from reinvested wealth? Why not just say they extract infinite value then.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fair, but my point is that the lion's share expands exponentially, not linearly, nor is it all consumed every year.

[–] spacesatan@leminal.space -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah from a macro perspective the snowball effect of capital leads to extremely unfair wealth distribution. But the image is from a micro perspective. Wages are closer to 60%-80% of profit produced and the image is claiming it's like 20%.

The image is kind of a bad way to portray the underlying problem. The skimming of wealth from the working class is real but the rate isn't as dramatic as the image claims.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The rate is massive at this point, considering how long it has been going on, especially due to imperierialism. You're referring to the labor aristocracy exclusively when you say 13,000 isn't life changing.

[–] spacesatan@leminal.space 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I said it is life changing and rate is not the same thing as extent.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

The picture is closer to the truth when you factor in imperialism, and the actual wealth gap.