this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
95 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39309 readers
342 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

so why advocate voting for progressive democrats when moderate democrats will not allow any progressive members to control the democrat party?

Because the centrist wing has lost all credibility and we're seeing their power to block progressives waning.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

we’re seeing their power to block progressives waning

do you have any evidence for this?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Mamdani's a good proof of concept. The party brought everything down it could to ratfuck him, before and after the primaries, and failed. We just had a progressive win in New Jersey. Another in Fort Worth.

Decisively in all cases.

That last one shows the centrist "we need to run centrists to win in conservative districts" line to be so much bullshit.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

that is definitely a litmus test for where democratic voters heads are at, but that's also definitely not control of party.

see schumer's mission statement of protecting isreal at all costs to understand where the democratic party leadership's heads are at despite bernie actually having a say in it.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

that is definitely a litmus test for where democratic voters heads are at, but that’s also definitely not control of party.

Not yet, no. But there haven't been a ton of races since trump won and it became undeniable that centrist democrats were both unprepared and unwilling to take on this challenge. The more progressives win, the more influence they can exert on the party.