this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
54 points (90.9% liked)

science

25697 readers
202 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

They also didn't have the technology we did, it is pretty self defeating to think we can't build something that can handle weight, because we don't already build stuff that can handle weight. Even though they built stuff still in use, obviously we can't, must be the weight, or else we would.

Yet their concrete is still in use and ours isn't, even that isn't under extra load. Maybe we are just cheap and short term? (we are.)

And also they would hold up, because there is nothing to break. If you get it on a solid foundation, stone locked in place with sand and the like, there is no where to go, stone is strong. So is concrete if you make it to be strong.