this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
355 points (98.4% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

15490 readers
1329 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 27 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

So, why is there no pedestrian bridge?

[–] knightly@pawb.social 36 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Holy Shit, making it from the nearest hotel across the canal turns a 1-mile walk into a 6-mile hike =U

That has to be deliberate, there's no other excuse for it.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

Deliberate in the sense that someone built a hotel on land that was cheap for reason?

Do you think that the city should engage a billion dollar civil engineering project to build a pedestrian bridge over a navigable canal so that it can serve whoever was dumb enough to build a hotel here?

To be clear, there are like a hundred hotels that you CAN walk to this stadium from, just not this one.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

A billion dollars for a pedestrian bridge? That thing had better be made of gold, then.

[–] general_kitten@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

found some figures about cost of bridge building and apparently if one were to construct a completely new pedestrian overpass/bridge over that canal would be on the ballpark of about 2-10 million dollars

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

That sounds a lot more reasonable. And that's a standalone bridge. If you want to be stingy, you could also just have a walkway on the side of the highway bridge. Make sure you've got a solid wall between the cars ajd pedestrians, of course.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 12 points 9 hours ago

How much extra do you think it would have cost to add an 6' walkway to the bridge when it was built, merely as a future-proofing mechanism? When your first thought is, "No one would ever want to walk from one side to the other instead of using some kind of transportation," these are the kind of results you get.

[–] withabeard@feddit.uk 6 points 12 hours ago

American dream

...

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 5 points 10 hours ago

The canal was there before the hotel, so that's probably a question for whoever built a hotel in a place that doesn't make any sense.

[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 14 points 15 hours ago

Keeps the poors out. — Cave Johnson, probably

[–] hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago

NJ DOT controls Rt 3 that goes over the bridge. You can recommend it to them.