this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
39 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

80978 readers
4695 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The paper.
https://eprint.iacr.org/2025/1237.pdf
It's worth a read. Lotta sarcasm going on.
16 pages. Dogs. Cards. Odds. Lies. Tariffs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dbtng@eviltoast.org 10 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Technocrit buried the lead when they posted this. Here it is with the actual paper highlighted.

Here's another paper describing the issues at play. This one is a bit more serious.
Craig Gidney - Why haven't quantum computers factored 21 yet?
https://algassert.com/post/2500

And apparently this field is ripe for humor. And Buzz Lightyear graphics.
The prior author did his own joke paper, which is too much for my head.
Falling with Style: Factoring up to 255 “with” a Quantum Computer
https://sigbovik.org/2025/proceedings.pdf#page=146

[–] CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Okay! Now we’re finally getting somewhere. I was trying to figure out if you use the computer to get the dog to interact with the abacus or how, and it turns out: no! You can do the factorization with just the computer, just the dog, or just the abacus. In the dog case, he threw a ball until his dog barked 3 times, then 5 times, and claimed this demonstrates the factorization of 15, because 15 is 3*5. The criticism is that, because you choose the number to be factorized, and then do special operations that only work for that particular factorization, all processes that are fine-tuned to produce the correct factors are equally valid, including training your dog to bark a certain number of times.