politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Types of congresspeople:
I'm here for the power: Mostly staying.
I'm here because I believe in true left causes: Mostly staying.
I'm here because I am a democrat and there's literally nothing wrong: Mostly staying.
I'm here for the money or conservative principles, never intended to change anything, and didn't sign up for this shit: Retiring to my Swiss chalet.
The article cites some democrats that are retiring to run for higher office. Great, anecdotal, but the only data they provide shows it's basically a Republican retirement wave. Overall I think it's a wash.
The retiring republicans will be replaced in small part by democrats if there is a blue wave and reasonably fair election, but many are fake MAGA (i.e., voting with Trump 100% of the time, but they don't like it and privately think it beneath them) who will be replaced by true-believer MAGA who are going to try to actively push us faster into fascism.
Not sure who is downvoting this. If you're young, you may have never experienced this in your life. But this comment nailed it.
I've reached an age where Im reminded of this constantly at all levels.
This one is the most common from my perspective. A lot of cheery hopefuls run for politics for one or two very specific causes. Then after watching the slow machine of government move and it takes 9 months to even get traction on their cause, they check out mentally and are just staying for the money.
In my town, while ICE is kidnapping people off the street, half of the local gov are silent because their political platform was to upgrade a park's dog area, or provide snacks for libraries, not dealing with armed masked goons.
For every AOC out there, there's a thousand acting gov officials that quietly just want a paycheck and healthcare, and then causally run again unopposed.
Yeah, you in turn nailed it. To paraphrase the Godfather, we have a peacetime government and we need a wartime government - not because we are asking for it, but because we have one party that is already attempting to actively overturn democracy, and there is no clear opposition strategy.
Oh, people are downvoting? I don't see anything (lemmynsfw disables downvotes). Didn't think I was saying anything controversial. Oh well.
I came to this comment when you had -2, which was ridiculous.
There's this German song from the 70s:
So, already in the 70s it was common knowledge that, as a politician, you start working on your retirement early. Then, when the shit hits the fan, all your sheep are safe and dry.
There are some Democrats, specifically the ones who decided to end the shutdown because the Republicans pinky promised they'd talk about extending ACA benefits (or something).
Confused how Swiss Chalet figures into all of this. Their 2 can dine deal in February is pretty good.
I was thinking the same thing. I’ve actually got a $50 gift card for there right now. Been making to take my wife there, we should get on that soon
"Been making"? I think you meant, "Fixing To". Where you from, boi?
The republicans are retiring so we can have more of this
Oof...
Also interesting to note that it seems common for the ruling party to see a lot of retirements in mid-terms, at least in the House.
Republicans have 30 retiring this time. In 2022 the Dems had 29 retirements under Biden. Trump saw 34 Republicans retire in 2018.
There are other outliers of course. The top year, 1992, was a presidential election and both parties saw a lot of retirements.