this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
646 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

80978 readers
4668 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] termaxima@slrpnk.net 46 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

I want GrapheneOS more than repairability, personally. I hope the Fairphone + GrapheneOS combination is possible some day...

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 25 points 22 hours ago (6 children)

The Graphene devs explicitly only support Pixels. Sticking with Graphene means continuing to give Google the profits from your hardware.

/e/OS is not bad as an alternative. The system wide ad and tracker blocking is nice.

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 2 points 7 hours ago

Sticking with Graphene means continuing to give Google the profits from your hardware

GrapheneOS only supports Google Pixel because they are the most secure Android phones, with open-source images and 5+ years of security updates.
You don't have to give money to Google. I got my Pixel 4a and my mother's 6a from second-hand sellers.

[–] mal3oon@lemmy.world 18 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

This is a big issue that the fairphone doesn't have its dtb open yet. It's not easy to build ROM for it. Despite their core claim of sustainability, without addressing the blobs, it remains just a tad more convenient for green minded people. We need a full Fairphone.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 6 points 17 hours ago

That's fair and all, and I see your point. A 100% "fair" phone is the end-goal.

Butin the battle against corporate douche-baggery, if we keep making perfect the enemy of good, we'll never get anywhere.

[–] 0x0@infosec.pub -4 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

And besides that, fairphone is just greenwashing when it comes to repairability, good luck finding parts for previous generations.

[–] raoul@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 15 hours ago

That demonstrably false by just going to the store...

I don't know why people keep saying that.

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

You can still get cameras and screens for the Fairphone 2 from Fairphone. No they're not making more, but they also have never said "unlimited support forever".

That the process doesn't require prying apart glue alone makes it significantly more repairable than any other mainstream phone.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 11 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

/e/OS is not bad as an alternative. The system wide ad and tracker blocking is nice.

I switched to e/os on a couple of motorolas that supported it and it's great so far.

The comparisons to GrapheneOS are fair to some degree, but also not. Graphene is meant to be privacy and security hardened, whereas e/OS, while it is more secure than regular android, is more concerned with privacy hardening. The biggest misconception people have seems to be thinking that privacy and security are the same thing; and while that is true on the surface level, security (a la GrapheneOS) goes much deeper.

So while my phone may not be as "hack resistant" as a GrapheneOS, it's degoogled and very protective of tracking, which is what I'm primarily concerned with. So I'm happy.

I just wish I could afford a fairphone in Canada.

[–] ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

FYI, I think your third mention of Graphene was meant to be /e/OS.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 4 points 15 hours ago

Whoops. Thanks for the catch.

[–] noname_no_worries@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I just bought a refurbished (as new) Pixel 9 to use Grapheneos.

Saved ~50% and didn't pay Google.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 3 points 22 hours ago

They said "possible someday", not "possible currently".

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Google makes way more on services so I don’t think they are making that much off the phones.

[–] atcorebcor@sh.itjust.works 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

What maskes you want Graphene over e/OS? I’m not so familiar with how they feel.

[–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Graphene modifies AOSP for much more security.

E.g.

  • you can disable USB data at a hardware level
  • Receives Kernel updates even faster than Google's phones
  • uses a different memory allocator, hardened_malloc
  • changes the way zygote launches apps, so ASLR actually works
  • doesn't allow apps to ptrace themselves
  • disables JIT per-app
  • disable network access per-app

I dont think e/OS is as security oriented, more privacy oriented

[–] atcorebcor@sh.itjust.works 3 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Thanks for sharing. For someone who is not so well versed in these technicalities, what does that mean for the user? That you’re more susceptible to fraud and hacking and malware?

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Basically GrapheneOS is for people worried about law enforcement or some state actors trying to access their phone using some commercial tools or 0 day exploits. It's useful for journalist, lawyers, activists and so on.

Average users don't really have to worry about those things. It's unlikely that someone will try to hack you using such tools, you most probably don't have any data wort protecting and it's quicker and easier for you to just unlock your phone than to spend days/weeks/months in jail trying to protect your data.

What average user should care about is removing Google from their phones and blocking trackers. Other ROMs like iode also come without Google and have better tools than GrapheneOS for blocking trackers. They are as secure as any other Android phone.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 13 hours ago

Average users don’t really have to worry about those things.

That's true, until it isn't. What's legal and moral now can change in a flash. Having a phone that's resistant to software infiltration isn't a bad thing.

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 5 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

A big thing is gOS not using JIT compiling. So, app updates are pretty slow but this kills a lot of malware exploits.

https://grapheneos.org/features#exploit-mitigations

[–] atcorebcor@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

So if I were to choose graphene over eOS it would mainly be to be more protected from malware?

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 2 points 16 hours ago

That and privacy, you also have a lot of control over what each app can do with gOS's permissions settings vs standard ROM and most of that is enabled by default. Can break some apps, especially banking related. I have 122 installed, of that three gave me a little bit of trouble where I had to disable some protections to get them functional. DeGoogled by default, I use microG for some limited Play services to get stuff like Youtube Revanced working.

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 21 hours ago

You would choose it for security hardening in general. E.g. it is harder for malware to infect, harder for unauthorized parties to gain access to data when the phone is locked, etc.

[–] LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

From a user's perspective, when you install an app, you can:

1. Determine if that app is allowed to access the internet.
2. If it _needs_ access to your contacts, **you** can share which of your contacts, it can see (or none at all)
3. If it _needs_ access to your files, **you** can determine which files/photos/music it sees (or none at all, but the application still believes it has access to everything)

There are a bunch of other, security features it provides, but from a "normal user" experience, the ability to take control of your data is probably one of the most impactful.

It is possible to do similar things with other CFW, but AFAIK, graphene is the only one to cleanly integrate it as a polished feature of the ROM.

[–] atcorebcor@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

I see, and it can’t be installed on Fairphone?

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

If I've got my story straight. (and if not, someone here will surely correct me)

For Graphene to deliver the advanced security provided by their OS, they need features found on newer processors and want more timely firmware updates. Google currently delivers on both needs.

FP is behind on hardware, prob cost cutting to make modular costs more affordable.

[–] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 20 hours ago

No, the Graphene developers insist on hardware functionality that is not present on the Fairphone.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

No, currently only on Pixels. Plans to support another future platform exist.

[–] atcorebcor@sh.itjust.works 3 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Hmm, in mean time I prefer buying Fairphone over supporting Google.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I prefer secure systems. Buy used/refurbished for not supporting Google.

[–] atcorebcor@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I think it still supports Google. If someone wants a Pixel and one less is available second hand, thats one more person buying it in store. Probably not 1:1 relationship there, but still.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 1 points 44 minutes ago

Precious few people bother with alternative ROMs. GOS users are a small subset of that. The impact on new Pixel device sales is very close to zero. In future, there is the promise of a new OEM. I wouldn't sweat it.

[–] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

You can buy second hand! Backmarket, Ebay, Facebook Marketplace, Craigslist.

[–] LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip 2 points 16 hours ago

Well, if you're patient Graphene release some messages that they're teaming up with a large phone manufacturer and will release a Graphene phone in Q4 2026 or 2027.

However, this announcement was made before all the AI hype which is consuming all the RAM.