Greentext

7780 readers

911 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works

167

Name it (lemmy.ml)

submitted 5 days ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works

96 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Doom

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Even 2016 and Eternal have pretty moderate requirements for their fidelity.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Arguably, 2016 and Eternal prove it much better than the original - people nowadays are way too spoilt to really appreciate those early 3D graphics, and IMO early 3D graphics aged much worse than pixel art.

[–] sploosh@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I don't think anyone disagrees about early 3d aging poorly. But I wouldn't even call OG Doom fully 3d on account of everything besides walls and floors being sprites. Sprites are just pixels, and no vertices mean no 3d.

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Also came here to say Doom. But can it (a potato) run Doom? Even if not, someone almost certainly will have tried and partially succeeded.

ps: And no other game listed in this topic can claim this