this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2026
31 points (94.3% liked)

Technology

80916 readers
2969 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Modern cars are packed with internet-connected widgets, many of them containing Chinese technology. Now, the car industry is scrambling to root out that tech ahead of a looming deadline, a test case for America’s ability to decouple from Chinese supply chains.

New U.S. rules will soon ban Chinese software in vehicle systems that connect to the cloud, part of an effort to prevent cameras, microphones and GPS tracking in cars from being exploited by foreign adversaries.

The move is “one of the most consequential and complex auto regulations in decades,” according to Hilary Cain, head of policy at trade group the Alliance for Automotive Innovation. “It requires a deep examination of supply chains and aggressive compliance timelines.”

Carmakers will need to attest to the U.S. government that, as of March 17, core elements of their products don’t contain code that was written in China or by a Chinese company. The rule also covers software for advanced autonomous driving and will be extended to connectivity hardware starting in 2029. Connected cars made by Chinese or China-controlled companies are also banned, wherever their software comes from.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 8 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Should be illegal for cars to have internet connections or to phone home.

Best part is companies like Toyota also charging you to use the network connection they use to spy on you for services like remote start.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 1 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

There are useful things about internet connections and phone home. Maybe not for you, but for many.

For company vehicles when the car is due for an oil change the mechanics should be informed not the driver. Likewise the company should be able to track where their cars are and when they are driving (and restrict them from driving outside of their territory). For things like snow plows the company needs to track where they have plowed already.

When it is cold it is nice to tell the car to start warming up 5 minutes before you get into it. For electric cars that are currently plugged in this is important as it lets you spend grid energy to warm up the car instead of range.

It is also useful to have up to date maps on the car - there are things a built in system can do that android auto / apple carplay cannot do. Though you have to drive a lot for this to be worth it. (My car as GM's onstar and no android auto - I don't pay for it, but I could see in a 10 minute test drive how onstar is better if you are driving the car for hours every day - since I mostly work from home or bike it isn't worth it, but I can see how it is better despite not being better)

But there needs to be a non-charge option for things like remote start.

[–] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

There should be an option to turn it all off for those who don't want to be spied on though.

Also, features like remote start could be implemented to function over a local network rather than needing to connect to the internet at all.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 1 points 5 hours ago

All spying needs to be owned by the person who owns the car. GM or however might have data, but it needs to not be accessible by them except by my agreement. Do I want my dealer to know when I need an oil change - maybe (depends on if I trust my dealer), or maybe I want my independent mechanic to know this, or maybe I change my own oil and want only me to know.

[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I don't believe for a second that a company fleet service is just free as-is through toyota. For that to be centrally managed they must have an enterprise service level that they have to pay for.

Toyota reports your driving information to your insurance nowadays using their built-in spyware that you cannot disable. Buddy driving your car recklessly? Too bad, you're a dangerous driver now and your rates go up.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 1 points 3 hours ago

You are not wrong - but the point is there is value here, are just not getting it to the right people.