this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2026
385 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

42355 readers
158 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] audaxdreik@pawb.social 95 points 2 months ago (2 children)

"since launch, more than a dog a day has been reunited with their family"

Yeah, because cats know how to evade the fascist state. All Cats Are Beautiful ...

[–] errer@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

400ish found out of 10 million is…incredibly pathetic, lol.

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's apparently enough justification to get people to consent to having their doorbell cams used for surveillance by 3rd parties 🫠

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yall do it with your smartphones and your airtags anyway.

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I consented to that when i accepted the EULAs on all the stuff i signed up for online over the years. I'm not consenting to this though! 😉

[–] Flames5123@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

AirTag doesn’t have facial recognition. Also there is no reverse engineering who an AirTag belongs to. Not even Apple can see in their databases.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean there are some ugly damn cats, for real.

[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (4 children)
[–] tomiant@piefed.social 10 points 2 months ago

That is a chupacabra. Not a cat.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago
[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ah i am feel ashamed. I wanted to put besides hairless cats. But i knew there are like a dozen cute ones in total. So i didnt thinking i was being mean.

Im gonna downvote my own comment.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

Don't take the precious! Smeagol wants it!

[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ugly but cute. If hairless, 🤮.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago

In this case the other end of the cat is cuter.

[–] tomenzgg@midwest.social 3 points 2 months ago

I would massage all of his scalp wrinkles.