this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
57 points (98.3% liked)

Programming

25416 readers
291 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It definitely feels outdated

What, why?

[–] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Compared to e.g. pushing a button in VS code and having your browser pop up with a pre-filled in github PR page? It's clunky, but that doesn't mean it's not useful.

For starters it's entirely decentralised, a single email address is all you need to commit to anything, regardless of where and how it's hosted. There was actually an article on lobsters recently that I thought was quite neat, how the combination of a patch-based workflow and email allows for entirely offline development, something that's simply not possible with things like github or codeberg.

https://ploum.net/2026-01-31-offline-git-send-email.html

The fact that you can "send" an email without actually sending it means you can queue the patch submissions up offline and then send them whenever you're ready, along with downloading the replies.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 21 hours ago

Ah, the process you mean. patch itself is still useful.