this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2026
77 points (98.7% liked)
The Trump-Epstein Files™
1184 readers
9 users here now
We keep track of the release of the files, but also to explore what’s already available, and why – with enough exposure – this could bring the man down, and who knows even his regime or the empire.
Want to start digging yourself? Check out our sticky post
Our Rules
(Subject to Change)
- #1 Be kind: keep it civil and amicable. The enemy is not in this community but in Palaces, The White House and penthouses.
- #2 Trigger Warnings: required. Mark posts which may be triggering to read or see for victims of sexual abuse with "[TW]" in front of your post title. If you're posting an image or video with explicit thumbnail, you will have to set the entire post as NSFW AND include the TW.
- #3 Cite sources: preferably direct link to the article/pdf and or an archive link in case there is a paywalled. In the article find a relevant few paragraphs and quote them in your post.
- #4 Post the Bates numbers: when referencing evidence (even if it is mentioned in an article), please post
- the Bates number of the file you’re referring to (EFTA00000000)
- a link to the original source
- a link to a mirror of the file in case DOJ pulls the file.
- #5 include key paragraphs: when posting articles, include a few key paragraphs of the article (not the entire article)
- #6 avoid links to social media as sources. Links to twitter must use xcancel.com.
Our Justice System
- First offence: warning + 2 day ban
- Second offence: 7 day ban
- Third offence: permanent ban from community
- Creating multiple accounts to interact with this community: permanent ban for all accounts in community + report to your instance admin.
This community is run by volunteers so please don't test the justice system, as with all justice systems it is critically underfunded.
founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
But why would they do that? Besides opening themselves up to getting caught and informing extra people who didn't need to know, why try to rush the announcement at all?
If there was no benefit to anyone, then it's more likely that this was actually a typo.
There's obviously a coverup here, but I don't see why making the announcement as quickly as possible would benefit that coverup.
i think it was a draft as part of a plan. some dude was like "and then we use this draft for a statement, boss. do you want anything changed?"
Quickly <> before it happened
Although yeah probably a typo. Still. No noose.
Could also be a template or an old document