this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
74 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
818 readers
418 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You can use whatever term you like. I generally prefer to speak in terms that people recognize and no one is going to mistake that ethnic cleansing is a good thing.
Incidentally, ethnic cleansing is also inclusive of things like deportation, which is why it's not just redundant with genocide.
We have terms like ethnic persecution, ethnic discrimination, pogroms and apartheid to describe the various levels of oppression. We don’t need to resort to using the “cleansing” rhetoric of the fascists
Ethnic cleansing is more specific than persecution and none of the other terms you mention encompass mass deportation.
Ok, well how about "mass deportation"
Sure, and what should we call it when it's a combination of methods like in the Nakba, for the purpose of clearing an area of people of the ethnicity in question, whether by killing, deporting, or scaring off?
Nakba was genocide
It involved genocide, but displacement was also an important element.
I feel like you are playing obtuse word games in order to cling to a term which, as a brown "dirty" person, constantly reminds me of the white urge to purge me from existence to "cleanse" it