this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
323 points (99.4% liked)
AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND
2998 readers
67 users here now
This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.
♦ ♦ ♦
RULES
❶ Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.
❷ Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.
❸ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.
❹ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.
❺ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.
❻ Don't be a dick.
Please also abide by the instance rules.
♦ ♦ ♦
Can't get enough? Visit my blog.
♦ ♦ ♦
Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.
$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
While it is true that the cultures we are born into usually are selectively-sociopathic, not all remain with that process/engineered-evolution.
& I've experienced bodhichitta, itself: so any claim that "everyone suspends their empathy" cannot apply to anyone who is permanently in bodhichitta: it's mutually-exclusive with suspending-empathy.
More-objective empathy makes one more & more incompatible with the cultures of this world, though: that is absolutely true.
One is "insane" according to the comparatively-sociopathic cultures that rule.
Exactly as Confucian Marxist Leninist culture in China deems spirituality insanity, & holds that it ought be subjected to psychiatric-treatment.
& .. to me, sociopathy is a spectrum, not a binary off/on toggle: most of the cultures of this world are somewhat sociopathic.
( I'm using "sociopathic" for induced-non-empathy, vs psychopathic for intrinsically-incapable-of-empathy )
Moneyarchy & concentration-of-wealth-archy absolutely do value DarkTriad-nature for dominance & supremacism.
The reason they're successful is because narcissism is normal in humankind, & therefore the "soil is rich" for that development, among our species..
which was actually my reason for opening this discussion to add:
https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/people-of-the-lie-m-scott-peck/1100181526?ean=9780684848594
identifies that the root of evil seems to be narcissism.
This guy, above, identifies it as non-empathy.
They seem to be 2 sides of the same coin, though:
if one has honest empathy for others, then that undermines narcissism.
If one hasn't empathy, then narcissism hasn't got anything competing against it, in one's sentience.
& that, itself, seems to be a bad problem.
I believe that the whole "it's narcissism 1st" vs "it's non-empathy 1st" is idiotic: chicken vs chicken-egg, argument..
They're co-evolving, aren't they?
_ /\ _