Flippanarchy
Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.
Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.
This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.
Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Rules
-
If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
-
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
-
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
-
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
-
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
-
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
-
No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
view the rest of the comments
Sorry, I changed the link pretty shortly to Ignatiev before you posted, so there was a possibility in my mind that you might not have gotten the right link.
Asians, including lighter-skin Asians, have been systematically excluded from whiteness. So I don't see how being Asian makes critique of whiteness any less important or valid.
And as Ignatiev says, the culture of whiteness is not even Irish, Nordic, Danish, Russian, etc. culture. In fact, in my view, whiteness replaces these organic cultures of white-skinned Europeans (warts and all) with a White monoculture. So if you care about the good parts of the various European cultural heritages, you should actually be against whiteness, because whiteness destroys culture.
And that is absolutely not what Ignatiev and other critiques of whiteness say or even imply.
And the middle "class" as it is used today is not a real class. It is a subset of the proletariat, specifically the more comfortable segment thereof. It is a capitalist framing meant to divide the proletariat.
From An Anarchist FAQ:
So it is absolutely not classist to dunk on people who identify as middle class to use this identity to assert that they are better or more deserving than the rest of the proletariat.
Comrade, you're patronizing me. Delete+reword.
👌