this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
86 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

11520 readers
504 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive: [ https://archive.is/Ljy3w ]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

The problem is the Liberals put no clause in to deal with this situation. They cant retroactively make a law against their own stupidity for signing a bad contract, the best they can do is arbitrarily punish them, sending the signal we operate our country not by laws but like North Korea. Companies would need to factor that into their risk metrics.

[–] Binturong@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

Oh do you ahev a copy of the contract on hand? I'd like to see how exactly you found out the details of the arrangement.

[–] fourish@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Aww. Baby cons are butt hurt.

Maybe time for a good round of fuck Trudeau? lol.

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Wasn't it billions of dollars?

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Seeing as neither of us know the details, we’ll see.

But if the money was given to invest here, and they withdraw their investments, even without a specific penalty clause that can be breach of contract and have damages.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

The problem is the Liberals put no clause in to deal with this situation.

of course they did. No one gets federal money without audits and milestones. Focus back on haircuts and socks, because you have no idea how these deal work.

[–] pubquiz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

WTFF is this screed? A deal signed before the naziamerican diaper shitter came back? Does our liddle con man have some hurt fee-fees because there was no clause written in for every possible eventuality?

Go emigrate, ungrate.

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Well I disagree with handing a private corporation money at all, especially when were borrowing to do so, and need that money for social housing.