this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
74 points (92.0% liked)

China, 中国

1118 readers
43 users here now

English

This is a forum dedicated to China, Chinese culture Chinese language, and Chinese people.

Our Matrix chat

Rules:

中文

这是一个专门讨论中国、中国文化、中国语言和中国人的论坛。

我们在 Matrix 的聊天室

规则:


Related communities / 相关的互联网论坛


Community icon by CustomDesign on MYICONFINDER, licensed under CC BY-NC 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
74
Ah. (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by Pierre121000@lemmy.ml to c/china@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It would be nice if China recognized that cars aren't the future at all. Every car produced has been a waste of resources and has created pressure for unsustainable suburban development. Every mile of road built represents 25,000 square feet of space that will never be reclaimed, never be useful again.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago

China has incredible rates of building high speed rail, public transit networks, and smart, walkable city design. Cars are supplementary.

[–] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

China absolutely does recognise that though? Why do you think they invest so much in public transport like HSR, sprawling subways and a huge bus network? They simply realise that the green revolution much like the socialist one is a process. You can't just press the green button and do away with cars, you need to first build up the infrastructure to support every part of society not just the urban cores.

Since cars remain a necessity for many as China has a huge swathe of rural areas not yet catered to (to the the extent required) by public transport connections it's best to have the cleanest best version of cars until they are.

It's the same logic behind why they built new coal plants even into last year. Coal is unfortunately still necessary to support the grid for now but the new ones are much more efficient and clean and therefore it's worth investing in their replacement with newer plants until they can be fully phased out.

[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

Adding to what @QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml said, keep in mind there's multiple different interests here. The bourgeoisie still make a significant amount of economic decisions in China, and they're heavily influenced by the west/capitalism. At the same time, the CPC guides those companies (either through voting shares or party connections) towards accomplishing the goals of the party.

So it is a contradiction. Should China do more to export trains instead of cars? Sure, but they're still somewhat at the mercy of the global market. And China is still the largest exporter of trains anyway.