this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
4 points (83.3% liked)

Friendly Carnivore

87 readers
7 users here now

Carnivore

The ultimate, zero carb, elimination diet

Meat Heals.

We are focused on health and lifestyle while trying to eat zero carb bioavailable foods.

Keep being AWESOME

We welcome engaged, polite, and logical debates and questions of any type


Purpose

Rules

  1. Be nice
  2. Stay on topic
  3. Don't farm rage
  4. Be respectful of other diets, choices, lifestyles!!!!
  5. No Blanket down voting - If you only come to this community to downvote its the wrong community for you
  6. No LLM generated posts . Don't represent machine output as your own, and don't use machines to burn human response time.

Other terms: LCHF Carnivore, Keto Carnivore, Ketogenic Carnivore, Low Carb Carnivore, Zero Carb Carnivore, Animal Based Diet, Animal Sourced Foods


Meta

Carnivore Resource List

If you need to block this community and the UI won't let you, go to settings -> blocks you can add it.

[Meta] Moderation Policy for Niche Communities

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Good walkthrough of the history of calorie in the context of the insulin model.

summerizerOrigins: heat, respiration, and measurement

  • Lavasier linked respiration with slow combustion and focused on measurable heat output.
  • Ice-melt calorimetry produced repeatable heat numbers; the calorimeter measured heat, not hunger.
  • 1800s calorimetry improvements enabled fuel comparison and efficiency accounting.

Late-1800s shift: apply combustion measurement to food

  • Population growth and industrial scaling increased demand for standardization and measurement.
  • Atwater burned food in a bomb calorimeter; released heat became the food “energy” number.
  • A key assumption followed: the body handles food energy roughly like combustion heat.

Where the calorie model omits biology

  • Digestion differs from sealed-chamber burning; humans are open systems with variable absorption.
  • Digestion costs energy, and hormones route energy to different fates; the bomb calorimeter omits this.
  • A single number can reduce attention to context once it exists.

Why the calorie spread

  • The USDA used calories for efficiency: feeding large groups cheaply and reliably, optimizing output per dollar/pound/shipment.
  • Calories enabled food swapping on paper and scaled ration planning, institutional feeding, and policy metrics.
  • Once embedded in reports and education, calories felt official; labels and regulation made them ubiquitous.

Incentives and downstream behavior

  • One number enabled food arithmetic: eat less, burn more, track the count.
  • Low-calorie options can gain default preference when taste is high; this rewards “tastier with fewer calories” products.

Equal calories, different outcomes example

  • 100 calories of steak and 100 calories of chocolate match on paper but differ in-body.
  • Steak: higher digestive cost, stronger satiety signaling, minimal insulin response, hunger quieter for hours.
  • Chocolate: rapid absorption, blood sugar and insulin spike, brief satiety, hunger returns quickly.

Thermodynamics and system condition

  • Energy conservation constrains what can happen, while complex systems vary within those constraints.
  • “Calories-only” fat loss is like “speed-only” flight: speed matters, but lift, wind, and control determine takeoff and stability.
  • System condition changes outcomes; chronic inflammation narrows margins, reduces efficiency, and alters handling of identical inputs.

Bottom line

  • The calorie persists because it standardizes the unstandardizable and supports administration and marketing.
  • A calorie measures heat energy in food; it does not determine what the body will do with that food.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 11 hours ago