this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
188 points (93.1% liked)

politics

27968 readers
4047 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

These votes demonstrate that the Democratic Party functions not as an opposition but as an enabler of the Trump administration. Its priority is to ensure the uninterrupted funding of the US military while diverting popular opposition with calls for meaningless cosmetic changes to the administration’s efforts to establish a presidential dictatorship.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Good cop and bad cop, but both cops. Build an opposing faction within the DNC that refuses to cooperate with establishment dems. Take the party over.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 22 hours ago

Yep, it's like having one manager at work who is really cool, and makes it easier to work, and another manager is a screaming tyrant who makes every moment at work horrific.

We'd all rather work for the nice boss, but make no mistake, they both have the same corporate objectives, just different ways of accomplishing it.

Both parties are just lackeys for the Sociopathic Oligarchs.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

This wouldn't work, the establishment has too many systems in place that would prevent this. We need to think outside of the system.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

The entire election system prevents third parties. MAGA took over the gop so it can absolutely happen. They aren't all genius political actors they are fallible, have vulnerabilities and can be out maneuvered by a large enough politically active base.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 1 points 22 hours ago

The entire election system prevents third parties.

Yes, that's why I said you need to think outside the system. You cannot reform the Democrats, and you cannot reform the US electoral system. Revolution is absolutely mandatory for people to live free.

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The difference is that MAGA isnt a threat to the status quo, if anything they are reinforcing the systems to protect it

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yes it was. Status quo wasn't fascism with Trump a dictator.

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world -1 points 3 hours ago

No it isn't. Where are you getting that from?

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 1 day ago

Cancel the dnc and rnc.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

Then explain MAGA taking over the GOP. If the status quo can't change, how could it change for them? This defeatism is useless and projection of your own sense of powerlessness.

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

They are reinforcing the systems that protect the status quo

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

What's happening isn't the status quo.

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yes it is, the only thing that's changed is the mechanisms defending it.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago

No it isn't, that's an absurd claim.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Unlike the Democrats, the GOP didn't have a superdelegate system in 2016. If they had such a system, Jeb Bush would've won the primary.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

So its possible.