this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
294 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

5041 readers
557 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
294
FBI Couldn’t Get into WaPo Reporter’s iPhone Because It Had Lockdown Mode Enabled (www.404media.co)
submitted 1 day ago by Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip to c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
70 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Probably not.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 20 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

To get back the seized property, owners must prove it was not involved in criminal activity.

Well, that just sounds amazing and not at all exploitable

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 11 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Seems a bit opposite of the whole "innocent until proven guilty" thing

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

Seized property under rico works the exact opposite, you have to prove your property innocent.