this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
106 points (90.2% liked)

Technology

80479 readers
3378 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
106
AI Didn't Break Copyright Law, It Just Exposed How Broken It Already Was (jasonwillems.com)
submitted 20 hours ago by Beep@lemmus.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
36 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Fan fiction and fan art, without appropriate permissions or licenses, are usually an infringement of the right of the copyright holder to prepare and license derivative works based on the original. Copyrights allow their owners to decide how their works can be used, including creating new derivative works off of the original product.

Seems pretty clear. It's at the discretion of the owner. The profit aspect doesn't matter in terms of the law, it just makes it likely that companies will go to court over it.

Additionally, usually as long as the fan content is non-commercial, it is not a problem with copyright holders.

Notice how it says with copyright holders and not with copyright laws.