this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
562 points (98.3% liked)

politics

27968 readers
2592 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] btsax@reddthat.com 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It certainly wouldn't have gone perfectly but I think the best evidence that it would have eventually worked out for the better is how much political power former slaves had shortly after the Civil War ended while Reconstruction, in whatever diluted form, was actually being attempted. This is the period we get the first black senator, Hiram Revels from Mississippi. Further, In 1868 black Americans made up a majority of the South Carolina's state legislature and opened the South's first public school system. Former slaves started taking up tons of local political offices as well. They wielded true local political power and although there were still racists opposed to their inclusion in society, it was much harder to extract former slaves from that society and subjugate them again. Once federal troops withdrew from the South all of these reforms were taken away, violently and illegally, by the people who weren't punished under Johnson, the violence and subjugation became much easier. This is how we get Jim Crow etc.

I mean, if this period had gone on for long enough for white Southerners to benefit from it, maybe a generation or so, we wouldn't even have the modern Republican party since it only exists today as an extension of white Southern racism that was enabled by Johnson. Instead, we get generation after generation of white Southern children being indoctrinated into racist beliefs because the leaders of the Confederacy were allowed to spread their hateful ideals throughout their society after they lost the war. We'd live in a much more egalitarian society as a whole if that hadn't happened. Again, not without its problems, but we would have solved the major problem. It's most of my issue with people today jumping to Trump being the worst president, not only is it recency bias but he's just the obvious result of decisions made by Johnson et. al. during Reconstruction.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Absolutely phenomenal points, especially how the growing political power of black citizens would have made a much larger impact on their futures in society, had it not been arrested by racist Southern state governments, and that was due to the Federal government pulling out, and letting the South govern themselves.

We can't do anything about it now, but we can learn from it, and not let the current MAGA government, an outgrowth of the worst racist policies our nation has ever tolerated, survive to live another day, once they've been stopped. We will need to crush MAGA, and fully purge it from American government and society. We can't make the mistake of letting these traitors off the hook, again, or we'll be back here in a other 100 years. We can't keep letting these moronic losers suppress our nation's progress any longer.

[–] btsax@reddthat.com 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Yes I fully agree, and thank you for the conversation. However I am deeply cynical American society will excise their fascist tumor since they have such a long history of refusing to punish criminals, enforce laws, and enact meaningful reform.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 13 hours ago

I totally understand that, which is why I'm saying that this UNPRECEDENTED situation will require unprecedented solutions, and we have to FORCE our elected officials to not fall back on the old patterns of following the easiest path of least resistance, and leave the same poison in our system.

IF we get out of this, we will have a once in a lifetime opportunity to move forward with entirely new strategies that will truly reconfigure our society to support American Citizens, and not just Sociopathic Oligarchs (many foreign) and their amoral, trans-National corporations. We can't squander that opportunity this time. Our citizens, the world, and history require that to redeem our Nation.