this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
26 points (77.1% liked)

Showerthoughts

40155 readers
1448 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There are a lot of opinions I'll likely have until I die, but comparatively few that I'm willing to die for.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

So weird, someone just told me I was willing to die on a hill for my opinion when they were getting downvoted to oblivion for their opinion, and holding to it.

I.e., figuratively, they were on their hill taking shots from all sides, unwilling to yield, and yelling down to me - with my similarly opinioned compatriots - that I was willing to die on my hill. It was so bizarre and I was thinking about how they didn't understand the meaning of the phrase, and then I came across this post.

This may not be the case here, but idioms like this can sound particularly weird when they're in a language that isn't your first language. This one doesn't sound weird to me except when used in the wrong way lol.

So just to be clear, the phrase isn't just about having differing opinions, nor actually putting your life on the line. It is about steadfastly holding to an unpopular (currently, or in the immediate context) opinion in the face of adversity. The more unpopular it is, the bigger the hill it seems to be, with fewer people defending it. In the military context the idiom derives from, hills were strategic goals and holding hills gave advantages. The harder a hill was to defend and hold, the more willing you needed to be to die to defend it (literally). In the idiomatic sense, "dying" might be more like getting yelled at from all sides - or downvoted in a huge way...

You said you have a few opinions you would be willing to die for. That's probably a bit more extreme than this phrase is intended for.

[–] klymilark@herbicide.fallcounty.omg.lol 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

someone just told me I was willing to die on a hill for my opinion

Yeah I saw that one, that was... Weird as hell.

This may not be the case here, but idioms like this can sound particularly weird when they're in a language that isn't your first language

Or when you're autistic, which is the case here, I'm a native English speaker xD

It is about steadfastly holding to an unpopular (...) opinion in the face of adversity.

Yeah, I frequently don't share those opinions to avoid the adversity. Not all of them, hell if you sort by "Most controversial" on my profile there's some good examples of me dying on a hill. More just the quiet beliefs that shape massive swathes of my worldview that I don't talk about frequently for one of a number of reasons.

Think that one might be the root of why this thought occurred to me, tbh; the difference between the opinions I hold that I will actively argue in favor of, vs the ones I hold that I don't really talk about in any context because, while they're important to me, they're not worth arguing over.

You said you have a few opinions you would be willing to die for. That's probably a bit more extreme than this phrase is intended for.

Fair, yeah. I tend to overanalyze these things, it's fun for me xD

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I just wanna say, I coulda called the autism from this post alone. Like a bright spot on my radar.

Oh, absolutely, I do very little to hide it online. Might start posting my RAADS-R score in profiles for fun xD

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

when they were getting downvoted to oblivion for their opinion, and holding to it.

As one should. Downvote is not a counter-argument. A single thoughtfully written response is infinitely more likely to make me change my view than endless downvotes are. Objectively true statements are being "downvoted to oblivion" here on a daily basis.

[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I was just more commenting on their use of the "hill to die on" thing than the quality or value of their argument. Like there wasn't anything I was doing to indicate it was a hill I was willing to die on, certainly not any more than they were.

That said, it wasn't just downvoting, several other people also jumped in to argue with them, and honestly they just seemed to be acting antagonistic for no reason.

And while downvotes aren't always an indicator of a weak argument, they certainly can be.