this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
355 points (96.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

10494 readers
2715 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

This is going way, waaay back... but basically...

For cishets at least:

Men tend to actually use pretty close to a standard normal distribution based around the actual midpoint, and actually use the entire scoring range.

Women tend to not do this, at all, and instead have a heavily biased or skewed way of using the scoring range.

(Where I mean bias and skew in their statistical definitions, primarily.)

Women only rate 19% of men as being average or better. Women also very often say they consider and talk to and date men who they view as not in their league.

And thats not like, a spurrious result from only one early dating app. There are many studies and published analyses that consistently show that women tend to be very picky or choosy or harsh or however you want to say it, tend to rate very few men as very attractive, compared to how men rate women as very attractive.


So, to apply this kind of data to your hypothetical on the 1-10 scale, doing a rough conversion for the 1-7 scale here:

Basically, if you are a man rating women, well you can see that 21% of women are rated 6/7 or 7/7...

... but if you are a woman rating men, the amount of men rated 6/7 or 7/7 is 2%.

That is to say, men find roughly 2 out of 10 women to score 7 or higher, whereas women find roughly 0 out of 10 men to score a 7 or higher, on a 1-10 scale.


This kind of data is also a literal foundational reason why all modern dating apps work the way they do.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

why all modern dating apps don't work the way they do.

FTFY

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

I just woke up and may not be reading this right, but if you mean to say that they are dysfunctional on purpose and work to exploit this mismatch for profit, as opposed to bridge the gap, than yes.