this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
346 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

80479 readers
4678 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the filings, Anthropic states, as reported by the Washington Post: “Project Panama is our effort to destructively scan all the books in the world. We don’t want it to be known that we are working on this.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 81 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I assume "destructively scan" means to cut the spine off so they lie flat, and that one copy of each book will be scanned? Isn't that a pretty normal way of doing it in cases where the prints aren't rare?

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Probably, yes. I think there's a copyright reason behind destroying the book?

[–] T156@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Not copyright, as much as if the book isn't precious, it's easier to do that, feed the loose pages into the scanner, and then get an intact one if you want it, compared to the additional expense of having to build and program a machine to carefully turn the pages and photograph what's inside, or the time it would need by comparison.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It just doesn't work if the spine is still there.

[–] Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 17 hours ago

Well spine scanners exist but they are pretty expensive and way slower

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, but I don't think they're checking what they're ingesting super hard, especially at those volumes.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

I can't imagine that scanning 'every book in the world' would require filtering, unless a ham sandwich or Nintendo 64 game has a chance of jumping into their production line then 'If book, then scan' is the only filter they need.

[–] Stefan_S_from_H@piefed.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Or throw the book into a shredder connected to a scanner that combines the page puzzle internally.