this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
52 points (98.1% liked)

Canada

11262 readers
799 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We talked about the possibility of an election, likelyhood and risk in another thread yesterday. With party and leader numbers like these... maybe it's more likely than I thought.

Src

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

but these numbers should give people massive pause at what the alternative looks like.

If you think anything Carney is doing is avoiding "the alternative" I have an America to sell you.

It's wild to me that with as centrist as Carney's been, he's barely pulled any of the actual conservative vote to him.

That's because centrist liberals don't, in fact, pull conservatives; I mean how would they? Centrists affirm that conservatives are right, and if you're right and have someone who represents you fully why would you settle for half measures? It's leftists who pull conservatives, because they actually present new/"new" solutions to people's problems.

TLDR: Between three parties that promise to kill all Jews, kill half of all Jews and implement minimum wage respectively, someone who believes the solution to their poverty is to kill all Jews is going to vote for either 1 or 3, but never 2.